New Jersey statute
N.J.S.A. 2C:35B-10 — Comparative responsibility governing action
Current through P.L.2025, c.346, and J.R.22
Part of Chapter 35B, Colorado Revised Statutes.
Full text of N.J.S.A. 2C:35B-10
Statutory text current through the P.L.2025, c.346, and J.R.22. This is an officially sanctioned publication using the official text of the Colorado Revised Statutes; it is not the official statutes of the State of Colorado.
10. a. An action by an individual user of a controlled dangerous substance is governed by the principles of comparative responsibility. Comparative responsibility attributed to an individual user does not bar the user's recovery but diminishes the award of damages proportionately, according to the measure of responsibility attributed to the user. The burden of proving comparative responsibility is on the defendant, who shall prove comparative responsibility by clear and convincing evidence.
b. Comparative responsibility shall not be attributed to a plaintiff who is not an individual user of a controlled substance, unless that plaintiff knowingly gave the individual user money for the purchase of the controlled dangerous substance.
L.2001, c.114, s.10.
Official sources
Legal terms used in this section
This reference is informational and is not legal advice.